AI reads 36 sources every 2 hours and ranks each story by importance from 1 to 5 - so you see what actually matters.
New Scientist takes a light look at the question of which science-themed tourist attraction is the most obscure, profiling the oddly specific sites that draw devoted visitors. The piece is a curiosity feature rather than hard news, with little wider consequence beyond interest to science enthusiasts.
New Scientist explores whether olfactory illusions exist, asking if smell can be deceived in ways similar to sight and hearing. The article is part three of a series on the question. It matters because such illusions could reveal how the brain constructs the perception of smell.
New Scientist explains the physics behind why fluid sometimes swirls into a spiral as it travels through a pipe. The piece covers the competing forces involved, including residual swirl from pumps, secondary flows in curved or rough pipes, and turbulence. It matters for how engineers design pipelines and predict mixing, pressure loss, and flow behaviour.
New Scientist has published its latest weekly collection of new questions from readers. The installment adds fresh queries to the magazine's long-running Q&A section. It is a routine feature that encourages public engagement with science but has little broader news impact.
New Scientist published a Twisteddoodles cartoon featuring the line “I made an AI version of you.” The comic uses humor to explore the idea of creating an AI replica of a person. It is a light, routine cartoon item rather than a major news development.
OpenAI has published a set of 722 mathematics papers, a move that has drawn scrutiny over mistakes and quality problems in the material. The company now faces the task of correcting or withdrawing flawed entries. The episode highlights the risks of rushing AI-generated or AI-assisted research content into the public record.
Researchers found that the British colonisation of Australia led to a major rise in wildfire danger, likely because it disrupted Indigenous land-management practices such as controlled cultural burning. The findings suggest that centuries-old changes in how the land was managed still shape today's bushfire risk, offering lessons for modern fire prevention.
New Scientist examines why "de-extinction" — finding or reviving species once thought lost — can do more harm than good. Rediscoveries may divert conservation funding, weaken legal protections for habitats, and create false confidence that extinction is reversible. The piece argues the focus should stay on preventing extinctions rather than reversing them.
OpenAI published a blog post about helping teenagers learn about AI, plan for its use, and shape its future. It matters because young people will inherit AI's risks and benefits, so their education and participation are key to responsible development.