Kairos: Open-source platform for risk and fraud decisions
A developer has released Kairos, an open-source platform for making risk and fraud decisions, announced via Hacker News' Show HN. It offers an alternative to commercial fraud-detection and decisioning tools, aimed at teams that want to self-host and customize their risk rules. Its relevance is mainly to developers and fintech teams evaluating open-source options.
Sources (1)
Related stories
Apple to Screen Shared iCloud Links for Harmful Content
Apple plans to check links shared through iCloud for harmful content, according to a report by The Verge. The move extends content moderation into Apple’s cloud-sharing features and raises questions about privacy and free expression for iCloud users.
AI PACs spend millions on Congress as OpenAI eyes 2028 election
AI-focused political action committees spent millions trying to influence congressional races, with results now being assessed. OpenAI is already positioning itself to shape the 2028 presidential election. The spending signals the AI industry’s growing effort to influence elections and policy as regulation is debated.
TechCrunch 2 links
Snapchat's paid subscription service tops 30 million subscribers
Snapchat's paid tier, Snapchat+, has surpassed 30 million paying subscribers, according to TechCrunch. The milestone shows parent company Snap is building a meaningful subscription business alongside its core advertising revenue. It matters as a sign that consumer apps can convert free users into recurring paying customers even amid ad-market volatility.
Meta acquires AI coding startup Conductor
Meta has acquired Conductor, an AI coding startup, with Conductor confirming that it is joining the company. The move adds another AI developer-tools team to Meta's lineup as large tech firms compete for talent and products in AI-assisted software development. Deal terms were not disclosed in the announcements.
Big Tech frames voter AI backlash as "anti-Trump," not "anti-tech"
According to Ars Technica, major technology companies are arguing that public anger over AI is driven by hostility toward President Trump rather than genuine concern about the industry itself. The framing shifts blame away from corporate AI practices and toward partisan politics, shaping how the debate over regulation and accountability will be understood.